竹島問題の歴史

Showing posts with label Links:_Docs/Maps - Japanese. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Links:_Docs/Maps - Japanese. Show all posts

13.9.08

1953 Daiichi-Daihou Maru Incident - the dispute over the Rhee Syngman Line

The ROK President Rhee Syngman suddenly drew a line called Rhee Syngman Line in January 1952 - it was 3 months before the Peace Treaty was to be effective. It was an illegal act from the viewpoint of international laws.


After this occasion, various problems occured. It was the beginning of the dispute over Liancourt Rocks (Takeshima/Dokdo). Among them, the Daiichi-Daihou Maru incident was one of the important incidents. However, there were already miscllaneous frictions appeared before the incident.

[Background: Attacks by Korean warships in 1952]

At 3:00 am on October 13th 1952, when 40 Japanese fishing boats including a fishing boat from Shizuoka prefecture called “Hokoku-Maru” were engaging in fishing squads within Japanese territorial waters at 30 miles east of Udo of Chejudo (Quelpart), three small warships of Korea suddenly machine-gunned them shooting tracer bullets.

And on both of 13th and 14th October, Japanese fishing boats including “Narita-Maru” and “Fukuei-maru” (both from Chiba prefecture), and four other fishing boats from Shizuoka prefecture were attacked by three Korean warships twice at around 20 to 30 miles southeast of Udo. At 11:00pm on October 16th, “Sunami-Maru” of Kanagawa prefecture was attacked by Korean warships at 30 miles east of Chejudo.


And in February 1953, the incident occured.


(The newspaper article at left: February 20th 1953, Asahi Shimbun -courtesy of chaamiey)
[The article said that Japan protested against Korea after revealing that it was an illegal shooting in the open waters.]






To follow is the details of the Daiichi Daihou Maru Incident in 1953:


At 7:00am on February 4th 1953, when two 57-ton fishing boats from Fukuoka, “Daiichi- Daihou Maru” and “Daini-Daihou Maru”, were engaging in fishing at the fishing area #284 which was 20 miles off Chejudo, two Korean fishing boats approached them from the southwest direction. They were called as “第一昌運号” and “第二昌運号” and they asked Japanese ships in Japanese, “How about today’s catch?” The two Korean ships passed Japanese ships and stopped for a while.

When the “Daiichi Daihou Maru” began to draw up fishing nets, a Korean ship that stayed 30 meters behind the stern of the Japanese ship began to shoot with automatic rifles. The two Japanese ships tried to run away but the “Daini Daihou Maru” was captured at 8:15am and the “Daiichi Daihou Maru” gave up to escape because of fierce shooting. The Korean fishing boats were pretending to be private fishing boats but they were heavily armed, Korean military police and navy officers were on the ships. The chief fisherman, Seto Jujirou (or Shigejirou), 34, was shot by the head and lost consciousness. The “Daiichi Daihou Maru” was captured at 8:30am and was ordered by men of the 第一昌運号 to go to 翰林面 of Chejudo. Japanese fishermen were then handed over to a police station, almost all the valuables in the ships including private properties were confiscated by the Korean police.

Japanese fishermen told the Korean Military Police officers that there was an injured. The injured chief fisherman was brought to a small clinic called 高医院 (clinic), but the doctor at the clinic said “No hope” and rejected to treat him. The fishermen asked police to bring him to a larger hospital but policemen said “We only worked by orders of military authorities, it is not our fault” and did nothing. So the Japanese fishermen asked the Military Police once again to bring him to a hospital but the chief of the Military Police said “He is wounded by a bullet which lodges in his head, so he won’t be survive” and did nothing. They repeatedly asked and finally, the chief fisherman was to be admitted to a military hospital. Korean officers said “A car will come soon”. The fishermen asked the clinic to give him an intravenous drip infusion until he was hospitalized but the doctor refused it because it was expensive. A fisherman promised the doctor to pay the bill after selling his private things, and the injured was given a drip infusion. But after all, Korean authority didn’t set a car for the injured. They left him unattended, he died at 11:00pm on February 6th.

On the next morning, his body was dissected to examine the cause of his death and to determine whether the bullet was shot by Military Police officers or by navy officers. It was a bullet shot by the Military Police. They asked the authority to arrange the cremation but their plea was ignored. The fishermen sold the rest of their private properties and held a funeral service for him. They cremated the body gathering pine woods next day.

The fishermen were confined at a room in an air-defense crew room near the police station on February 9th. The room was so small for 18 people, its extent was only about four futon mats. Foods were not given, so they had to eat the rest of the foods which they managed to bring from their ships. On examination, Korean authority insisted that they captured the Japanese ships at the sea 9 miles from 翰林. However, Japanese fishermen pointed out the inconsistency between the time difference of compass of Korean ships and the velocity of the ships. Then, Korean authority proposed to take the middle of their opinions – 13 miles and forced the fishermen to sign the document.

However, according to the radio operator of the “Daini-Daihou Maru”, they were captured at 30 miles from翰林.

When they were sent to Cheju (North part of Chejudo) on February 12th, they noticed that they didn’t have the chief fisherman’s ashes. They asked to bring the ashes but the head of the police station rejected the request. They were moved to the section 2 of the inspection department of Cheju Police Station (済州警察査察課第二係) and were jailed at 11pm without meals.

The Korean Police made a report in hanglu that mentioned the Japanese fishermen violated territorial waters of Korea and forced the fishermen to sign it. While they made the report, they measured a chart with a cigarette and a match along with a ruler, which was an inaccurate measurement.

After it revealed that the ships were captured in open waters, the Commander of Korean Coast Blockade & Escort Fleet - the U.S. Rear Admiral Glitch (spelling unsure) [朝鮮沿岸封鎖護衛艦隊令官グリッチ少将] in Sasebo, Japan, asked for an interview with the President Rhee Syngman. The President Rhee expressed his regret over the incident and the fishermen were released in the end.
[Thanks to Kaneganese for proof-reading]

But this was only one of the incidents. Many of the captured fishermen were detained for 3 or 4 years. Their fishing boats were confiscated and re-used as Korean fishing boats. 3929 of Japanese people were arrested, 328 of Japanese ships were seized, and casualty was 44 of Japanese.

In July 1954 Korea began to occupy the island. To follow is from a newsclip of the New York Times, July 31, 1954. This is how the illegal occupation of Liancourt Rocks by Korea began.

Japanese sources said today the South Koreans had seized
and occupied the Takeshima islands in the Sea of Japan. Title to the islands
long had been in dispute between the two nations.


Two Japanese patrol boats cruising near Takeshima saw a
half-dozen Koreans at work on Mishi Island [sic], one of two rocky islets that make up
the Takeshima group.


The men were uniforms of white shirts and green trousers.
Apparently they were guards sent by the Republic of Korea to enforce the claim
to Takeshima, the Japanese maritime Safety Board reported. It was not apparent
whether the men were armed, the report said, but they evidently intended to stay
on the island.


A large tent had been pitched on what looked like a
permanent foundation, coast guardsmen said. And on the northern side of Mishi a
large sign had been erected with the legend, "Republic of Korea, Seventh
District, Civil Administration Department".


The Japanese made no attempt to land, according to the
Maritime Board, but patrol boats circled the island, broadcasting through their
public address systems that the islands were Japanese territory. To this the
Koreans appeared to pay no attention.


The Japanese visit was made Wednesday by two patrol
ships, the Kuzuryu and Nagara. The Koreans, the Japanese assumed, had been in
posession at least since July 25, the date inscribed on the
signboard.


The Japanese deduced that the Koreans' presence was not a
temporary stop-over, such as is sometimes made by fishermen at
Takeshima.


No Korean vessel was in the vicinity, according to the
Japanese coast guards, leading to the belief the South Koreans had been embarked
on the island with supplies to last sometime.


Takeshima, lying at about Lat. 37 degrees 7 minutes N.
and Long. 131 degree 55 minutes E., consists of two islands, Nishi, the west
island, and Higashi, the east island. Earlier this month, the South Korean
Assembly in a formal proclamation asserted soverignty over both islets and a
party of Assemblymen was reported to have sailed from Pusan this week to inspect
the territory.


The islands have been a bone of contention between Japan
and the Korean Republic since the San Francisco Peace Treaty of Sept.8, 1951,
restored independence to this nation.


The rocky barren islets, which cover only few square
miles, have served as a useful temporary base for fishermen trawling in the Sea
of Japan. According to the Japanese Foreign Office, the islands have been so
used by Japanese fishermen for more than 300 years and at one time were known as
Matsushima or Pine Islands. They were formally incoprporated into the Japanese
national territory in 1905.


Takeshima lay on the Japanese side of the "MacArthur
Line", established as a boundary beyond which the Japanese might not go during
the Allied occupation without special consent. Later, however, when President
Syngman Rhee of Korea set up the "Rhee Line", extending Korean territorial
waters far out into the Sea of Japan, the islands fell on the Korean side of the
boundary.


The Japanese Government, though claiming posession of
Takeshima, apparently has not been able to decide, to date, what to do about
Korea's claims. Last year, answering questions in the Diet, Foreign Minister
Katsuo Okazaki told the members it was "clear by the San Francisco Peace Treaty
that Takeshima is an island of Japan." At that time he said he had "not heard"
of the Korean claim and did not believe the issue worth disputing.


Meanwhile, negotiations between Japan and Korea over
reparations, the establishment of regular diplomatic negotiations and other
issues have completely broken down. So far as is known, posession of the islands
has never been formally discussed, though each side has continued to advance its
own claim to the territory.







23.6.08

1899 American map of Japan and 1894 Japanese map of Korea

I recently got a map of Japan which was published by George F. Cram of Chicago (USA) in 1899. There are "Taka Isl" , "Matsu Isl" and "Liancourt Rocks" in the Sea of Japan. Korea and Izumo distcrict of Japan were coloured in almost the same colour (light green) as well as these islands, so unfortunately we can't decide which country these islands belonged to.
However, as this map is a large one, it would be good to learn the locations of these islands.


The three longitudinal lines in the close-up map (above) indicate the longitude 129 degree, 131 degree and 133 degree (E) respectively from west to east, so you will find Taka Island, that is Argonaut island, locates at less than 130 dgree (about 129 degree 50'). Also you'll find Matsu Island, Dagelet Island or the true Ulleungdo, is located at less than 131 degree (about 130 degree 50'), Liancourt Rocks at less than 132 degree (about 131 degree 50').

Here is a Japanese map called "新撰朝鮮国全図" (Newly Edited Whole Map of Chosun Country) which was published in 1894. It has been used by pro-Korean people to insist that Japan admitted Dokdo to be Korean territory. There are two islands in the Sea of Japan - 竹島(Takeshima) and 松島(Matsushima), which pro-Korean people insist as Ulleungdo and Liancourt Rocks (Takeshima/Dokdo).
If the map below is too small to examine, please visit here: http://www.geocities.jp/tanaka_kunitaka/takeshima/senshin-1894/
If you examine the map precisely, you will notice that the longitudinal line beside Takeshima runs beside Iki island at south, which locates at around 129 degree 40' - so this longitudinal line may mean longitude 130 degree. Then it may mean "Takeshima" in the map is located at about 130 degree (129 degree 50') - it coincides with Argonaut island which was mentioned above. The next longitudinal line runs through Kitakyushu (Kokura) that locates at 131 degree. "Matsushima" in the map is located at the middle of the two lines - it seems as it locates at about 130 degree 40', which is almost the place of Ulleungdo although not very accurate. By the way, as Liancourt Rocks locate at about 131 degree 50' as we showed above, so Liancourt Rocks is out of this map.

But there is a problem - the map was not drawn in east longitude based on the Greenwich point but it was drawn in west longitude based on the Japanese standard point at Azabu, Tokyo (139 degree 44' 28" E). The island "Takeshima" in the map is located beside the line "九". The Chinese number "九" means "9 degree W" here, which is similar to "130 degree 44' E". But if this line means "130 degree 44' E", it must run through Kitakyushu because Kitakyushu is located at 130 degree 50', but the line crossed Saga prefecture, one degree west. Instead, the line "八" (8 degree W) which is 131 degree 44' E crossed Kitakyushu. So you can understand that this map is incorrect, as whole the Japanese figure in the map was drawn mistakenly just one degree east. Then, the problem is that we can't decide whether the two islands "Takeshima" and "Matsushima" were also drawn one degree east or not.

1) If the two islands were also drawn one degree east, "Takeshima" in the map (slightly less than 130 degree 44' E, maybe around 130 degree 40' E) should be at about 129 degree 40' E. This is almost the same place as Argonaut island (129 degree 50' E). "Matsushima" which is located at the middle of the lines 8 degree W and 9 degree W (more precisely slightly eastwardly shifted from the middle point; almost 131 degree 30' E) should be 130 degree 30' E which is close to Dagelet island (130 degree 50' E).

2) If the two islands were drawn just the exact places, "Takeshima" is located at about 130 degree 40' E, which is near to Dagelet island (130 degree 50' E) while "Matsushima" is located at 131 degree 30' E, which is almost the middle point between Dagelet island and Liancourt Rocks.
By the way, the east limit of the map is 西経八度 (= 131 degree 44' E) which excluded Liancourt Rocks (131 degree 50' E) - if they tried to draw Liancourt Rocks, the rocks were to be drawn in the margin of the map. But there is no such rocks were drawn in the map.

Considering other maps with Takeshima and Matsushima from the same era (see the references), 1) should be most likely the case. Even if 2) was the case, it didn't always refer to Liancourt Rocks.

References:
東京地学協会編 朝鮮全図 (1894;  http://www.tanaka-kunitaka.net/takeshima/tokyo-1894/ ) with Ulleungdo - Matsushima at slightly west than 131 degree E,
朝鮮全岸 (1896; http://www.geocities.jp/tanaka_kunitaka/takeshima/koreacoast-1896/ ) with Ulleungdo- Matsushima at around 131 degree E,
日本全図 (1877; http://www.geocities.jp/tanaka_kunitaka/takeshima/nihonzenzu-1877/ ) with
Takeshima at slightly west of 西十度 line = 129 degree 44' E and Matsushima at slightly west of 西九度 line = 130 degree 44' E (which means these are Argonaut and Dagelet islands)



As a result, "竹島(Takeshima)" in the map is highly likely Argonaut island, whcih western maps sometimes called as "Take Isl" or "Taka Isl." while "松島 (Matsushima)" in the map is highly likely true Ulleungdo or Dagelet island, which western maps sometimes called as "Matsu Isl." - so these two islands in the map coincided with "Taka Isl" and "Matsu Isl" in the American map.

Of course, no one can say from this map that Japan admitted Dokdo to be Korean territory.

1.9.07

Late 18th & 19th Century Japanese Maps Showed Ulleungdo & Liancourt Rocks as Japanese

The following 1790 Japanese map shows Ulleungdo (竹シマ = 竹島 - Takeshima) and Liancourt Rocks (松シマ = 松島) as Japanese territory, based on the color of the islands. The full map can be seen HERE, and its cover can be seen HERE.



Japan had given up her claim to Ulleungdo in th 1690s, so I do not know why the map is showing Ulleungdo (竹島) as Japanese territory, but what is significant about the map is that it clearly shows Liancourt Rocks (松島) as Japanese territory.

I do not know what he is saying, but Tanaka Kunitaka talks a little bit about the map HERE.

The following Japanese map is called the 亜細亜小東洋圖, and appeared in an 1835 atlas called 唐土歴代州郡沿革地図. The original atlas and map were made in 1789, and are stored in Japan's National Diet Library. The map shows Ulleungdo (竹シマ = 竹島 - Takeshima) and Liancourt Rocks (松シマ = 松島 - Matsushima) in red, which designated them as Japanese territory.



The following 1861 Japanese map is called 新刊輿地全図. It shows an island that was most probably Ulleungdo labeled as タケ(Take), which was almost certainly an abreviation of Takeshima (竹島). The island is colored in red, which designates it as Japanese territory.



Japan gave up her claim to Ulleungdo in the 1690s, but by the late 1700s and early 1800s, it appears some Japanese maps were once again showing Ulleungdo (Takeshima) as Japanese territory. I wonder why?

31.5.07

Japanese Document and Map Links

Japanese Documents

Edo Era(江戸時代) (1600-1867)

Meiji Era(明治時代)(1868-1912)

Taisho Era(大正時代)(1912-1926)

Showa Era(昭和時代)(1926-1989)

Heisei Era(平成時代)(1989- )


Japanese Maps

Edo Era(江戸時代) (1600-1867)

Meiji Era(明治時代)(1868-1912)