http://japanese.joins.com/article/article.php?aid=105035&servcode=700§code=750
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bf14/1bf1486303a9f2d5b08e01d04702a58a5d652577" alt=""
But the map in the article was not 三国接壌之図 but 朝鮮八道誌(朝鮮八道之図) by the same geographer Hayashi Shiei. Ulleungdo was labeled as "Ulleungdo Usanguku", which was not a proof of sovereignty of Dokdo. Pro-Korean people once claimed "東" in the map shows that Japan Sea was called as 東海 (Tong-he) in Japan too but it was a big mistake - the word 東 (east) was only written to show a point of the compass. http://toron.pepper.jp/jp/take/jpn/hakken.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c925a/c925af423bdf401c4d50b13e20af17bdbc58dbf0" alt=""
If he "auctioned off" the maps, that that would mean he sold the maps, but since he is thinking about giving them to a museum, then he must have "bought the maps at an auction."
ReplyDeleteGerry,
ReplyDeleteThanks, I corrected the mistake.
You can see whole map of Hayashi Shihei's "朝鮮八道図 of 三国通覧図説" here.
ReplyDelete"南" & "西" are also written on the other sides. 東 on this map only means it is the eastern side of Joseon peninsula. Is Choson Ilbo ignorant of map or intentionally lying ? If Korean newspaper keeps doing this kind of distortion, Korean themselves lose any credibility from outside of their country.
Kaneganese,
ReplyDeleteThanks. The newspaper company may have taken a simple mistake - taking another map by the same geographer (Hayashi Shihei) as 三国接壌之図.
BTW, the islet drawn beside Ulleungdo in the 三国接壌之図 is not Liancourt Rocks but Jukdo. Even if Kim Jang-Hoon really bought the map 三国接壌之図, it wouldn't be a help for pro-Korean scholars' claim.
BTW, the map 朝鮮八道図 by Hayashi Shihei has just been auctioned at eBay. The highest bid was $1,025.
ReplyDeletehttp://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&item=250295286549