tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post6981412614736825394..comments2024-01-26T17:48:29.804+09:00Comments on Dokdo-or-Takeshima?: 1904年2月20日 「満韓新図」Gerry Bevershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14311939520870098017noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-6703186457151785262008-12-22T22:42:00.000+09:002008-12-22T22:42:00.000+09:00Thank you for that link, GTOMR. There are some goo...Thank you for that link, GTOMR. There are some good maps on that site.Gerry Bevershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311939520870098017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-86100986118353729902008-12-22T11:01:00.000+09:002008-12-22T11:01:00.000+09:00The 満韓新図 in this post was published on 1904.02.20 ...The 満韓新図 in this post was published on 1904.02.20 by 博文館. <BR/><BR/>There are another version of <A HREF="http://blog.daum.net/sabul358/16249185" REL="nofollow">満韓新図 by 黒龍会 on 1904</A>.GTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-11296579630478980552008-06-25T12:00:00.000+09:002008-06-25T12:00:00.000+09:00I don't know who published this map. However, I do...I don't know who published this map. However, I don't think who published the map is important. <BR/><BR/>BTW, 黒龍会 (Black Dragon party) is one of the legal parties who were interested in Siberia and Russia, not that illegal party.pacifisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14100903035796287895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-19359496632379401172008-06-25T10:33:00.000+09:002008-06-25T10:33:00.000+09:00Understood.The national border is drawn as "-..-.....Understood.<BR/><BR/>The national border is drawn as "-..-..-" in the legend. <BR/><BR/>However, what is your opinion on the fact that this map, 「満韓新図」 was published by 「黒龍会」?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-76271552774547841942008-06-24T16:39:00.000+09:002008-06-24T16:39:00.000+09:00anonymous,Please take a look closely, the national...anonymous,<BR/><BR/>Please take a look closely, the national border (国界) was drawn as -・-・- which can be seen between Takeshima and Matsushima, and north of Tsushima, while other lines meant seabed cable and ship lane (broken line). (I think you misunderstood the ship lane as the national border.)<BR/><BR/>So this map shows that Tsushima is in Japanese territory.pacifisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14100903035796287895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-26620219531570868922008-06-24T16:09:00.000+09:002008-06-24T16:09:00.000+09:00What about "Tsushima (対馬)"? Does this island belon...What about "Tsushima (対馬)"? <BR/><BR/>Does this island belong to Korea according to your logic?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com