tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post6551419942436786107..comments2024-01-26T17:48:29.804+09:00Comments on Dokdo-or-Takeshima?: Q 3: Why did old Korean maps show Ulleungdo as two islands?Gerry Bevershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14311939520870098017noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-74606483449289572352011-10-13T15:41:04.513+09:002011-10-13T15:41:04.513+09:00To Gerry Bevers
If you can, why don’t you do some...To Gerry Bevers<br /><br />If you can, why don’t you do some work like this about the old Japanese maps which didn’t include Dokdo as part of Japan. The title could be “Why didn’t old Japanese maps mark Dokdo as territory of Japan?”slowwhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01523416862007638345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-20554178584228065552011-10-13T15:39:53.833+09:002011-10-13T15:39:53.833+09:00This comment has been removed by the author.slowwhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01523416862007638345noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-42414867513413617612011-04-24T20:38:09.794+09:002011-04-24T20:38:09.794+09:00Hey Garris.
I know you are trying to say 'Usa...Hey Garris.<br /><br />I know you are trying to say 'Usan-do' was the Main island.. referring to that the Korean officials called the area by 'Usan,Mulleung area' putting U-san first.<br /><br />And later.. you ignored some Korean officials calling the area just 'mulleung'<br /><br />even though putting something first doesn't prove it's bigger any better that putting it alone..<br /><br />Where is the logic? Garry..ace_venturahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07240781273047385320noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-20295299387313300642010-02-02T01:05:19.013+09:002010-02-02T01:05:19.013+09:00Gerry, this will be a first meeting with you. So I...Gerry, this will be a first meeting with you. So I don`t know who you are, what your work is. But let me tell you something. This problem is not a simple thing as you thought and drove. During reading this article, the article said all things from your head are very logical and right, even nuetral. But for me, it`s just all things you want to say on your own way. It`s not an information. I think an article must be shown just an information, not your guess. Besides, I think you wear just one-colored glasses. Anyway, I think you need to be more nuetral in any articles you wrote.<br /><br />In detail, I want you to write every articles in this site in various kinds of ways after this time.<br /><br />If you want to make a discussion, you`d never write an one-way article.Dokdohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16309591373566435707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-46356165155630059142008-08-06T06:46:00.000+09:002008-08-06T06:46:00.000+09:00Gerry, You try to explain a map published in 1530 ...Gerry, You try to explain a map published in 1530 with random texts dated back to 1413. <BR/><BR/>I don`t think that such a method is valid.helpfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10863144851806876124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-79427603273778104482008-08-06T03:23:00.000+09:002008-08-06T03:23:00.000+09:00This comment has been removed by the author.helpfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10863144851806876124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-57368361996297203382008-08-04T22:59:00.000+09:002008-08-04T22:59:00.000+09:00Wow, this is great.Thanks gerry.Wow, this is great.<BR/>Thanks gerry.pacifisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14100903035796287895noreply@blogger.com