tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post4152076597580289978..comments2024-01-26T17:48:29.804+09:00Comments on Dokdo-or-Takeshima?: "70% of Japanese Think Dokdo is Theirs: Poll"Gerry Bevershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14311939520870098017noreply@blogger.comBlogger54125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-22345310174603248662017-05-01T14:44:47.407+09:002017-05-01T14:44:47.407+09:00I think you got that wrong. Starting from year 512...I think you got that wrong. Starting from year 512 there is evidence that dokdo is korea's.and in year 1693 there is the an young buk problem. Even in japan's map it said that dokdo was korea's a hundreds year ago.Also at uear 1900 the world even made a law that japan can not say thay dokdo is their's amd that dokdo is korea's. Also did you check the internet before? Even in the Wikipedia it says that dokdo is korea's.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16566780244790774202noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-76818953932912844322016-12-23T12:18:56.184+09:002016-12-23T12:18:56.184+09:00Japanese people only follow what it says on the sf...Japanese people only follow what it says on the sf treaty. But they do not realize that their government has been distorting their documents. Then why are these Japanese historians lying? <br /><br /><br />http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/588561.html<br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08499941589284602700noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-57226252881280711202013-09-11T08:06:50.947+09:002013-09-11T08:06:50.947+09:00Think of it this way...
Korea wants Dokdo because...Think of it this way...<br /><br />Korea wants Dokdo because of its historical value. To them it's been there's before, during, and after the Japanese enslavement of Korea. They don't want to ruin the peaceful, calm look and most Koreans have gone to Dokdo at least once. <br /><br />Japan wants Dokdo because of its resources. They want to ruin, I mean, put the things there to good use. Now this may slightly deform the rocky islet, but to them, who gives two shits? Not one person even gives one.<br /><br />Oh, Dokdo would also be a great strategic military point for Japan. Who wouldn't want another world domination plot, I mean, for self-defense, you know.<br /><br />So stop being biased all of you. It sounds like kids wanting the last cookie. In my opinion, they should just poll the whole world, asking,"Do you think Dokdo should belong to Korea or Japan? Korea wants if you historical value, while Japan wants to use its resources up and make a military base maybe." See what they say, then give it to the people who got the most votes. Of course, this might start another war...<br /><br />So stop thinking biased and think from each one's perspective. Tell me (or anybody) what you think. And please don't just go," It's Japan's cuz Koreans eat dogs lol," or something like that.<br />DatDudehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00485352996919027989noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-34936901686763533502013-07-02T04:52:01.275+09:002013-07-02T04:52:01.275+09:00This is funny..... because everyone is using "...This is funny..... because everyone is using "DOKDO" and even pacifist who is saying "DOKDO" is Japan's is using "DOKDO" and not "TAKESHIMA".....<br /><br />BTW helpfish is right and pacifist is wrong.... well in my opinion....<br /><br /><br />1. You`re denying that Hideyoshi and Tojo tried to conquer the world? YOu don`t learn that in Japan?<br />They are not korean...<br /><br />"2. Korea owns Dokdo, what would be the benefit for Korea?"<br />economically a lot because of the tourist attraction and also the fish.<br /><br /><br />According to the international law, Korea doesn't own the island. They only occupied it unlawfully.<br />that is the japan's opinion. in Korea Dokdo is known to be Korea's territory and lawful.<br /><br /><br /><br />"3. If Japan would own Dokdo and stationed Police on it, 70% of Koreans would never think the island as theirs"<br />too bad because Korea already owns Dokdo and stationed Police on it and still 70% of japanese thought it was theirs. (greedy) ps. this article says 70% OF japanese people think Dokdo is theirs.<br /><br />and you are acting so clever but really i dont think u are better than a goldfish. did u know that official japanese maps during the 8th to 19th century don't have Dokdo in it? while Korea's first official map in the 16th century did? even if it was on the map it was clearly shown as a different country's territory.<br /><br /><br />last word i know i am being mean and i am not suppose to i NEED to say this... U r DUM! Koreanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04730612423516371296noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-20287810428118030962008-08-07T12:44:00.000+09:002008-08-07T12:44:00.000+09:00misol221,You wrote;"Don't you know 99.99% of Korea...misol221,<BR/><BR/>You wrote;<BR/><BR/>"Don't you know 99.99% of Korean have thought Dockdo belongs to Korean territory".<BR/><BR/>Very dreadfull result if this is correct. It's a totalitarianism, it reminds me of Japan before 1945.<BR/><BR/>This is because of Korean distorted education after Rhee Syngman took the island. Rhee Syngman used education for justification of what he did. They have educated people in the same way as Japan Imperialism did in the wartime.<BR/><BR/>Please notice bright Korean people! Please read the original documents by yourself, not internet info of proppaganda websites.pacifisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14100903035796287895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-24169970228081854592008-08-07T12:42:00.000+09:002008-08-07T12:42:00.000+09:00dogdo-takeshima,Besides, there isn't any "Dokdo" t...dogdo-takeshima,<BR/><BR/>Besides, there isn't any "Dokdo" that you irrationally and blindly fight for as its out-of-pocket propagandist in the BGN database.<BR/><BR/>There is your nickname "Dogdo", however.Raquelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777067933400361301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-17192399113554651722008-08-07T12:19:00.000+09:002008-08-07T12:19:00.000+09:00dogdo-takeshima,Korea have had de facto sovereignt...dogdo-takeshima,<BR/><BR/>Korea have had de facto sovereignty over the Liancourt Rocks since 1952.<BR/><BR/>As a Korea-centric propagandist, you better come up with more creative lies.<BR/><BR/>It is just that the Japanese Government legitimately and peacefully refuses to recognize the de facto sovereignty of Korea over the Liancourt Rocks.<BR/><BR/>___________________________________<BR/><BR/>They had incorrectly labelled the islands as "sovereignty disputed" but corrected this problem. What's not disputed is that the Koreans now have sovereignty over the islands.Raquelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777067933400361301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-48833274059856373202008-08-07T12:02:00.000+09:002008-08-07T12:02:00.000+09:00Tsk tsk tsk... Poor Raquel...just a kid...Tsk tsk tsk... Poor Raquel...<BR/><BR/>just a kid...dokdo-takeshima.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04262234000937445458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-75548146212608778352008-08-07T11:58:00.000+09:002008-08-07T11:58:00.000+09:00miso,Don't you know that 99.99% of the Koreans had...miso,<BR/><BR/>Don't you know that 99.99% of the Koreans had thought Hwang Wu-seok(황우석) was a genius?<BR/><BR/>And the 99.99% turned out to have been thinking very wrong.<BR/><BR/>The same thing will happen with Dokdo.<BR/> <BR/>___________________________________<BR/><BR/>99.99% of Koreans have thought Dockdo belongs to Korean territory.Raquelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777067933400361301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-10410720407490648192008-08-07T00:49:00.000+09:002008-08-07T00:49:00.000+09:00Hi!Don't you know 99.99% of Korean have thought Do...Hi!<BR/>Don't you know 99.99% of Korean have thought Dockdo belongs to Korean territory.misolhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02266372962226721468noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-24926168229310908312008-08-06T20:08:00.000+09:002008-08-06T20:08:00.000+09:00Pacifits are you so busy posting propaganda that y...Pacifits are you so busy posting propaganda that you can't take the time to read the news from your own website?<BR/><BR/>The Americans agree the islands are disputed. They had incorrectly labelled the islands as "sovereignty disputed" but corrected this problem. What's not disputed is that the Koreans now have sovereignty over the islands.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/07/113_28523.html" REL="nofollow">Americans-Acknowledge-Korean-Sovereignty-Over-Dokdo</A><BR/><BR/>So because the real world considers Liancourt Rocks Korean territory, you can be sure Japan's dishonest government is deliberately misleading the international community with false maps. <BR/><BR/>So you dont' need to mislead the public by posting 50 year old outdated confidential memorandums Pacifist. We know the Americans acknowledge Korean sovereignty over Dokdo.<BR/><BR/>Helpfish, don't waste your time with Raquel. She's just a kid.dokdo-takeshima.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04262234000937445458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-1570674094903019662008-08-06T19:22:00.000+09:002008-08-06T19:22:00.000+09:00Backing of Japan?There was no Japan at that time.Backing of Japan?<BR/>There was no Japan at that time.helpfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10863144851806876124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-65798876204279543232008-08-06T19:11:00.000+09:002008-08-06T19:11:00.000+09:00helpfish,Munyeong was made the 25th king of Baekje...helpfish,<BR/><BR/>Munyeong was made the 25th king of Baekje with the Japan's backing.<BR/><BR/>So, he was actually a puppet king under the direct control of Japan in those days.<BR/><BR/>Anyway, take it easy, a son of Munyeong born in Japan.Raquelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777067933400361301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-36693690610888575572008-08-06T18:50:00.000+09:002008-08-06T18:50:00.000+09:00Rachel, I heard about that but i am not sure.But i...Rachel, <BR/><BR/>I heard about that but i am not sure.<BR/>But if it satisfies you, Lee Myung-Bak, the Korean president was born in Japan too.helpfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10863144851806876124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-279416625482765012008-08-06T18:43:00.000+09:002008-08-06T18:43:00.000+09:00helpfish,The last question.Do you know that King M...helpfish,<BR/><BR/>The last question.<BR/><BR/>Do you know that King Munyeong of Baekje was born in Japan?Raquelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777067933400361301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-62912258782095812172008-08-06T18:42:00.000+09:002008-08-06T18:42:00.000+09:00Steve,"Pacifist, do you have Alzheimer's disease?"...Steve,<BR/><BR/>"Pacifist, do you have Alzheimer's disease?"<BR/><BR/>This words are for you, Steve.<BR/><BR/> <BR/>"The American's just reconfirmed Korean sovereignty over Dokdo a week ago". <BR/><BR/>They only confirmed about the name of the island which USA uses. It's not about sovereignty, as spokesman said.<BR/>It was a favour to the president Lee Myung-bak, as he is a far better president than the former one for USA (and for Japan too). USA don't want him to resign but he was in the crisis because of BSE problem and this problem.pacifisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14100903035796287895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-23962614171661895442008-08-06T18:37:00.000+09:002008-08-06T18:37:00.000+09:00Rachel, I don`t know why i am answering to your ch...Rachel, <BR/><BR/>I don`t know why i am answering to your childish questions but at that time there has been a (surprise surprise!) ally between Baekje (Kudara) and Japan (Wa). Japan needed teachers and Baekje needed military help against Silla and Koguryeo. Thats why they sent hostages.helpfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10863144851806876124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-69860925461915510582008-08-06T18:34:00.001+09:002008-08-06T18:34:00.001+09:00Raquel are you still calling me childish names (do...Raquel are you still calling me childish names (dogdo) Is that the best ya got? It doesn't hide your limpdick arguments. If you spent more time reading instead of beating your gums maybe you'd understand better.<BR/><BR/>The world acknowledges Korea's sovereignty over the Dokdo as the Americans confirmed last week. They also understand the islands are disputed. Knowing this Japan's maps are propaganda and inexcusable.<BR/><BR/>Japan has every right to print the islands are disputed on maps but to simply put a line between Ulleungdo and Dokdo or to mark the islands as part of Japan is pure propaganda. What a disappointment that the second most powerful nation of earth resorts to such childish tactics.dokdo-takeshima.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04262234000937445458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-8478392014966712802008-08-06T18:34:00.000+09:002008-08-06T18:34:00.000+09:00helpfish,So, do you know that King Gaero of Baekje...helpfish,<BR/><BR/>So, do you know that King Gaero of Baekje sent his daughter and brother as hostages to Japan?<BR/><BR/>And what was the reason for sending them as hostages?Raquelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777067933400361301noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-36571365849424451602008-08-06T18:33:00.001+09:002008-08-06T18:33:00.001+09:00The japanese have invaded Korea since 1890. They k...The japanese have invaded Korea since 1890. They killed the korean empress in 1895. They completely annexed Korea in 1910 (through the use of force, though illegally).<BR/><BR/>You try to say that the incorporation of Dokdo in 1905 was legal and not based on aggression?<BR/><BR/>I don`t need any japanese influenced judge to say that this wasn`t a legal incorporation.helpfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10863144851806876124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-24474480198071089782008-08-06T18:33:00.000+09:002008-08-06T18:33:00.000+09:00^they have a police station on it^they have a police station on itUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18349193277260141719noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-1044710989355318722008-08-06T18:30:00.000+09:002008-08-06T18:30:00.000+09:00helpfish,So if the international society recognise...helpfish,<BR/><BR/>So if the international society recognised the incorporation in 1905, why don't you think so?<BR/><BR/>It is a self-centered view, isn't it? <BR/><BR/>You have to show the evidence for the world to convince them that Korea has a right to own Takeshima/Dokdo. But she has not yet suceeded to show the evidence. So then, why do you insist that the 1905 incorporation was illegal and the Korean occupation is legal?<BR/><BR/>What is your ground?pacifisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14100903035796287895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-51252588359322702512008-08-06T18:26:00.001+09:002008-08-06T18:26:00.001+09:00Pacifist, do you have Alzheimer's disease? The Ame...Pacifist, do you have Alzheimer's disease? The American's just reconfirmed Korean sovereignty over Dokdo a week ago. Why quote 50 year old confidential memorandums when the American's stated who has sovereignty just a few days ago. This shows how twisted your opinions are.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://dokdo-or-takeshima.blogspot.com/2008/07/us-reinstates-s-korean-sovereignty-over.html" REL="nofollow">Koreans-Have-Sovereignty-Over-Dokdo</A><BR/><BR/>We know the following Japanese maps are shameless propaganda when America already confirmed Korean sovereignty over Dokdo Takeshima.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.dokdo-takeshima.com/japanese-tricks2.jpg" REL="nofollow">Japan's-Slimy-MOFA1</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.dokdo-takeshima.com/mapfan-1.jpg" REL="nofollow">Japan's-Slimy-MOFA2</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.dokdo-takeshima.com/mapfan-3.jpg" REL="nofollow">Japan's-Slimy-MOFA3</A><BR/><BR/>Japan's MOFA. Asian neighbours should be very careful not to trust them!!<BR/><BR/>Pacifist, legal 1905 and legal 2008 are two different matters my friend. That is why Japan can never have Dokdo. Their 1905 incorporation was flawed in so many ways we cannot possibly use it as a equitable premise to establish a boundary between Japan and Korea.dokdo-takeshima.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04262234000937445458noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-60902494896210330682008-08-06T18:26:00.000+09:002008-08-06T18:26:00.000+09:00Rachel, 1. Quote "Other Yahoo international websit...Rachel, <BR/><BR/>1. Quote "Other Yahoo international websites such as Yahoo.com and Yahoo.co.kr do not show this incorrect boundary line."<BR/><BR/>2. The 1905 incorporation into Oki prefecture has been illegal like the annexation of Korea. It happened through the use of force.helpfishhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10863144851806876124noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-15015303904734747912008-08-06T18:23:00.001+09:002008-08-06T18:23:00.001+09:00dogdo-takeshima,You are shooting in your foot agai...dogdo-takeshima,<BR/><BR/>You are shooting in your foot again.<BR/><BR/>So, according to your healthy logic, is it okay for Korea to draw a line between Takeshima and Oki without the consent of Japan?Raquelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06777067933400361301noreply@blogger.com