tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post1074547227972453918..comments2024-01-26T17:48:29.804+09:00Comments on Dokdo-or-Takeshima?: Korean Eastern limits described in various books world wide exclude Takeshima/Dokdo from Korean TerritoryGerry Bevershttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14311939520870098017noreply@blogger.comBlogger20125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-39643826519065711152012-05-14T00:25:46.046+09:002012-05-14T00:25:46.046+09:00It's funny the pro-Japanese people try to make...It's funny the pro-Japanese people try to make readers trust Japanese description of Korean territorial limit. What's the base for deciding the limit of Korean territory?<br /><br />They are all based on the wrong information or intentional distortion on Korean territorial limit because there is accurate evidence deciding the territory of Korea. The Japanese maps and documents consistently included Dokdo as Korean territory. <br /><br />Which is more reliable?slowwhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10705001704163840289noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-21461366368480873072010-06-04T21:15:26.733+09:002010-06-04T21:15:26.733+09:001907.04.韓国通覧 統監府農商工部 (M43)
第一 地理 一 位置、境界、面積
東経124度...1907.04.<a href="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/766847/15" rel="nofollow">韓国通覧 統監府農商工部</a> (M43)<br />第一 地理 一 位置、境界、面積<br />東経124度13分(鴨緑江西端)より130度54分(鬱陵島東端)にXき東は日本海に臨みGTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-58453884453438490742009-05-27T15:38:55.468+09:002009-05-27T15:38:55.468+09:001915.大日本帝国地誌 小林房太郞 著 富山房 小林房太郞 著
富山房
下巻 第一章 位置およ...1915.<A HREF="http://www.dlibrary.go.kr/JavaClient/Servlet/SearchServlet?command=brief&kwStr=%E5%A4%A7%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E5%B8%9D%E5%9C%8B%E5%9C%B0%E8%AA%8C&v_db_str=&v_cmp_str=&dbNoArr=17&v_sort1=1&v_sort_type=0&v_close=&startNo=1&pageNum=5&mode=0&ViewMode=1" REL="nofollow">大日本帝国地誌 小林房太郞 著 富山房</A> 小林房太郞 著<br /> 富山房<br /><br />下巻 第一章 位置および面積 (E-book P130) <br /> 第一 位置<br /> 朝鮮 極東 鬱陵 130度54分 鬱陵島GTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-60779908911816885142009-04-09T16:39:00.000+09:002009-04-09T16:39:00.000+09:001917.新舊對照朝鮮全道府郡面里洞名稱一覽 越智唯七130"54'E 極東鬱陵島東端1917.新舊對照朝鮮全道府郡面里洞名稱一覽 越智唯七<BR/><A HREF="http://www16.tok2.com/home/otakeshimaoxdokdox/Japan%20records/1917.NewOldKoreaplaceofnamelistUldoeasternmost.jpg" REL="nofollow">130"54'E 極東鬱陵島東端</A>GTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-87677217285391818442008-08-29T23:49:00.000+09:002008-08-29T23:49:00.000+09:00Thanks, GTOMRI think I need to post the updated on...Thanks, GTOMR<BR/><BR/>I think I need to post the updated one in the near future.Kaneganesehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15533339719864245857noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-22081390771823556422008-08-29T20:32:00.000+09:002008-08-29T20:32:00.000+09:001905.世界地理 野口保興講述 早稲田大学三十八年度歴史地理科第一学年講義録130"58'E190...1905.世界地理 野口保興講述 早稲田大学三十八年度歴史地理科第一学年講義録<BR/><A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=43056167&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=22&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">130"58'E</A><BR/><BR/>1907.世界地理 野口保興講述早稲田大学三十九年度歴史地理科第一学年講義録<BR/><A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=43056187&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=22&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">130"58'E</A>GTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-66431806018528476192008-08-29T19:15:00.000+09:002008-08-29T19:15:00.000+09:001906.1907世界大地誌 野口保興著 東京:成美堂,明38,39130"58'E1906.1907世界大地誌 野口保興著 東京:成美堂,明38,39<BR/><A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=40005942&VOL_NUM=00001&KOMA=55&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">130"58'E</A>GTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-29047496330657228522008-08-29T17:28:00.000+09:002008-08-29T17:28:00.000+09:001910.02韓国南満洲 野口保興著 東京:成美堂,明43.2一三〇度三八分なり一三〇度三五分 朝鮮...1910.02韓国南満洲 野口保興著 東京:成美堂,明43.2<BR/><A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=40010251&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=8&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">一三〇度三八分なり<BR/>一三〇度三五分 朝鮮水路誌<BR/>一三〇度三〇分 チャンパー地名辞典</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=40010251&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=12&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">付属圖</A><BR/>鬱陵島(松島)<BR/><BR/>What is チャンパー地名辞典?GTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-57036845552722081972008-08-29T14:38:00.000+09:002008-08-29T14:38:00.000+09:001903.韓国森林視察復命書〔東京〕:農商務省山林局,明36.5130”35付属圖竹島=Argona...1903.韓国森林視察復命書<BR/>〔東京〕:農商務省山林局,明36.5<BR/><A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=40063553&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=20&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">130”35</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=40063553&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=5&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">付属圖</A><BR/>竹島=Argonaut 松島=Ullnuegdo/Dagelet<BR/><BR/>Cf:<BR/>1906.韓国森林調査書〔東京〕:農商務省山林局,〔明39〕<BR/>no discription of easternmost boundary<BR/><A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=40063554&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=3&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">付属圖</A> <BR/>松島=Ulleungdo/DageletGTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-66161680598026043662008-08-17T23:22:00.000+09:002008-08-17T23:22:00.000+09:001929.朝鮮환輿勝覽130”58E1929.<BR/>朝鮮환輿勝覽<BR/>130”58EGTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-66620349584158467812008-08-06T22:34:00.000+09:002008-08-06T22:34:00.000+09:001907 韓国総攬 徳永勲美 博文館130”35’E1907 <A HREF="http://auction.rarebook.co.kr/cgi-bin/view?type=2002&code=A10000376" REL="nofollow">韓国総攬</A> 徳永勲美 博文館<BR/>130”35’EGTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-88379176034313102282008-08-06T16:14:00.000+09:002008-08-06T16:14:00.000+09:00I think (No.40) 韓国通覧 was published on Apr 1910(Mei...I think (No.40) <A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=40010247&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=15&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">韓国通覧</A> was published on Apr 1910(Meiji43), not 1911.<BR/><BR/>another eastern most data;<BR/>1910.10 <A HREF="http://kindai.ndl.go.jp/BIImgFrame.php?JP_NUM=40010306&VOL_NUM=00000&KOMA=129&ITYPE=0" REL="nofollow">朝鮮新地理</A> 大阪:田中宋栄堂,(<BR/>Oct.Meiji43)<BR/>東経130”58’EGTOMRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06881539471132140299noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-30586686372189163882008-06-30T12:29:00.000+09:002008-06-30T12:29:00.000+09:00raquel,Thanks. I still hope there will be Korean p...raquel,<BR/><BR/>Thanks. I still hope there will be Korean people someday who have logical brain, objective eyes and brave heart to say the truth to all the Korean people.pacifisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14100903035796287895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-77251645051454123882008-06-30T12:01:00.000+09:002008-06-30T12:01:00.000+09:00pacifist,All the evidences show that Korea had not...pacifist,<BR/><BR/>All the evidences show that Korea had not known the Liancourt Rocks<BR/>before 1900. <BR/><BR/>Once, Korea was stating that "Dok" of Dokdo is from the Jeolla-do dialect meaning "Dol" (stone), and now, they are claiming that it is the "Dok" meaning a stone from the Gyeongsang-do dialect.<BR/><BR/>If Korea was calling the Rocks as "Dokseom" by either Jeolla-do or Gyeongang-do dialect, it makes sense.<BR/><BR/>However, the difficult task that Korea is having in finding the logical explanation is that "Dokseom" can not become "Dokdo" in any way in their language.<BR/><BR/>So, we should expect more lies from their desperate attempt to keep the Rocks. :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-57184961055467328792008-06-29T19:00:00.000+09:002008-06-29T19:00:00.000+09:00Kaneganese,Thanks for your endeavour, this is quit...Kaneganese,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for your endeavour, this is quite impressive to anyone who has interest in the Takeshima (Dokdo) issue.<BR/><BR/>Thanks also to raquel, you are saying that Rhee Syngmann was "火事場泥棒" (a thief who rob anything from a house that is fired). Just exactly!. <BR/><BR/>The most vicious thing is that the house owner can't stop the thief because he/she has to extinguish the fire first. <BR/><BR/>Japan couldn't stop the malicious deed by Rhee Syngmann because she was under the control of GHQ (General Headquarters) of allied powers until April 28th 1952 - the day of the Peace Treaty concluded. Rhee Syngmann's line was declared on January 18th that year, apparently Rhee intended to "rob" the island while Japan was occupied by allied powers.pacifisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14100903035796287895noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-63508962731358465762008-06-29T02:33:00.000+09:002008-06-29T02:33:00.000+09:00Kaneganese,Perhaps, that's how Choi Nam-seon escap...Kaneganese,<BR/><BR/>Perhaps, that's how Choi Nam-seon escaped from being labeled as a "Chinilpa" (Pro-Japanese Group).<BR/><BR/>It is very unfortunate that Korea was claiming for Tsushima (Daemado) as well without any historical basis for her claim, which only shows how greedy Korea was under the Rhee autocracy.<BR/><BR/>I strongly suggest that Japan should not let the "thief at a fire" go free. I bet you all know who the "thief at a fire" is. :-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-70843759788063799952008-06-28T23:46:00.000+09:002008-06-28T23:46:00.000+09:00raquel,Thanks for the English title for Cho's book...raquel,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the English title for Cho's book. And I'm really impressed that you know a lot about Takeshima issue. I hope your research in Korea goes well. If there is something I can do for you, please let me know. <BR/><BR/>As for Cho, he was not only a famous historian, but also a key person for Korean territorial aggression in early 1950s led by president Rhee and his official delegates. If Korean deny his book, it means Korean loses her own basis for her stupid theory. It was Cho who officially started the "Usando is Dokdo" propaganda afterall.<BR/><BR/>"-韓国が竹島を自国領とした根拠は。 「後の日韓国交正常化交渉の第五次の韓国側代表を務めた兪鎮午によると、著名な歴史学者である崔南善を訪れ、竹島が日韓両国のどちらに属すか、歴史的な根拠を尋ねたという。その結果『確信できる程度の説明』を受けたと言っている」", 発信竹島 ~真の日韓親善に向けて~ : 第3部「過去の清算」-昭和から平成へ-(2)巻き返し, San-in Chuo Shimpo, 2005/09/25. "<BR/><BR/>"-李承晩ラインを宣言する際、そのお墨付きを求めた韓国政府に対し、歴史学者の崔南善が示した歴史認識とは。「崔は一九五四年夏、ソウル新聞紙上で『鬱陵島と独島』と題し、二十五回にわたる連載を執筆している。そこで展開された説によると、鬱陵島の属島である独島は新羅時代から朝鮮領で、その起源は五一二年にまでさかのぼれるとした。さらに『粛宗実録』(一七二八年刊行)にある『江戸幕府と交渉し、鬱陵島と独島を朝鮮領と認めさせた』という安龍福の証言を基に、現在の独島は韓国領と結論づけている」", 発信竹島 ~真の日韓親善に向けて~ : 第3部「過去の清算」-昭和から平成へ-(5)矛盾, San-in Chuo Shimpo, 2005/09/28."Kaneganesehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15533339719864245857noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-63029448196182078242008-06-28T17:55:00.000+09:002008-06-28T17:55:00.000+09:00Steve Barber,What college did you attend, and what...Steve Barber,<BR/><BR/>What college did you attend, and what was your major? Also, where are you working these days?<BR/><BR/>You are being obnoxiously arrogant for someone who used to post under five or six different id's until you were discovered.Gerry Bevershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14311939520870098017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-92190850330415610972008-06-28T17:11:00.000+09:002008-06-28T17:11:00.000+09:00Wasn't Choi Nam Seon a pro Japanese supporter?Raqu...Wasn't Choi Nam Seon a pro Japanese supporter?<BR/><BR/>Raquel? You e-mailed me a little while ago saying you were a student from Cincinnati. Please tell us which college you attend, your program and teacher so we can help you!!<BR/><BR/>Or are you a fake?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26948035.post-55645628027933294892008-06-28T16:17:00.000+09:002008-06-28T16:17:00.000+09:00Kaneganese,Choi Nam-seon's book title should be "G...Kaneganese,<BR/><BR/>Choi Nam-seon's book title should be "General Knowledge of Joseon", I think.<BR/><BR/>Today's Koreans are trying to get away from those evidences because they were written by private people, not by the official government.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com